At first glance the maxim Nothing in excess! is a call to follow the golden mean. Care must be taken, however, that the golden mean never turns into mediocrity. The golden mean is not an average, which might also be pictured as the mean of bad and good. Good and bad that barely depart from the average yield the same average as good and bad that depart from it widely; indeed, the result can even be produced with good and bad of ever-growing amplitude. In today's world, ever better and ever worse things are happening.
If we examine human intelligence, it may be that its average has not changed for millennia, but this balance comes about with a mass of mediocre people just as it does when we take into account those who depart widely from the average, the much more stupid and the much cleverer. The overwhelming majority of people perform at about the average, and the number of those whose performance is exceptionally low or exceptionally high – whether favourable or deviant – is negligible.
Nothing in excess! (Meden agan) – one of the mottoes of the Greek philosophers.
Strive for the right balance: be brave without rashness, cautious but not timid, compassionate but not weak, just but not judgemental, reticent but not misleading, clever but not crafty, courteous without flattery, resolute but not stubborn, thoughtful but not hesitant, patient but not careless, friendly but not partial, aspiring without selfishness.
The true middle way is a golden proportion, like the golden section that marks both nature and the human body, and which can be discovered in the spiral of a snail shell or a pine cone, in Bartók's music, or in the proportions of the human face and hand. Man is a small world, the world is a vast man, and their proportions hint at the parallel between micro- and macrocosm.
At the end of his ascetic practices, Buddha happened to overhear a music teacher's instruction: ‘If the string is slack, it sounds out of tune; if you overtighten it, it snaps.’ The golden mean signifies balance, the safety that lies between the extremes. The middle is not the best, but nor is it the worst, and at the same time it is not a dull average. Most people rate themselves a little above average, feeling, for example, that they are somewhat better drivers than the average. Yet not everyone can be better than average. This modest surplus of self-confidence works within us as a subconscious survival strategy, and it seems to be needed for living through the struggles of worldly existence.
This middle way also marks man's ontological position: no longer a demon and not yet an angel, he walks somewhere halfway between the two. The task of human life is to find harmony between bodily needs and spiritual ideals. It is a balance, and the optimum of every earthly system always counterbalances something. The world works not at the maximum and not at the minimum, but at the optimum. The optimum is the least that ideal functioning requires.
If we examine the precept nothing in excess more closely, we find this hidden message in it. The material world is formed and moved by the interplay of three forces – mass, energy and light. These three qualities can also be read in moral terms: mass is ignorance, that is, the loss of value; energy is passion, that is, the consumption of value; while light is goodness, that is, the increase of value. In terms of measurability, we may say that mass has the character of a minimum, energy of a maximum, while goodness has that of an optimum. Likewise: ash – minimum, flame – maximum, embers – optimum, or sorrow – minimum, pleasure – maximum, serenity – optimum.
In this light, nothing is the negating, void character of ignorance, and in excess the vehemence of passion. So if passion and ignorance cancel each other out, what remains is the quality of goodness, whose nature is light; in other words, the prohibition is rather a call to practise goodness!