Fantasy is always intu­it­ive in nature, but its prompt­ings need not be taken for holy writ. Pure intu­ition, too, is always fant­ast­ic in nature, and we do bet­ter to take its prompt­ings for holy writ. How hard it is for these two, fantasy and intu­ition, to under­stand each other! At least as hard as for two people who at times talk past each other, at times under­stand each other, and at times are in full agree­ment, depend­ing on how far the mes­sage con­veyed and the mes­sage received coin­cide. If we regard con­vey­ing and receiv­ing each as a field, and the two fields do not over­lap at all, then no com­mu­nic­a­tion takes place, and those involved talk past each other. Where the over­lap is slight, we can speak of incom­plete under­stand­ing, and the lar­ger the com­mon sur­face of the two fields, the more thor­ough and deep­er the under­stand­ing between the two sides. We can speak of full agree­ment when not only do the fields of inform­a­tion largely coin­cide – per­haps they never over­lap per­fectly, pre­cisely because of the unique­ness of the indi­vidu­al – but a com­munity of inten­tion also becomes mani­fest. That is pre­cisely why this is no longer under­stand­ing each other, but under­stand­ing as one. Labour­ing togeth­er for com­mon goals allows an alto­geth­er excep­tion­al kind of com­mu­nic­a­tion, in which the parties, though they see the facts from their own points of view, still judge them in har­mony, and so arrive at views that com­ple­ment and amp­li­fy one anoth­er.

For much can be con­veyed, and a less­er or great­er part of it under­stood, depend­ing on the capa­cit­ies of the receiv­er, but the pos­sib­il­ity of per­son­al insights must always be left open. Accord­ing to Pas­cal, people believe far more read­ily in truths they have recog­nised for them­selves than when someone tells them the same thing.

Immeas­ur­able as the thirst for know­ledge may be in young people, they must not only be taught but also left to ripen. Instead of the prin­ciple of author­ity, first-hand exper­i­ence – this is the watch­word of syn­er­gist­ic cooper­a­tion! Mutu­al sac­ri­fice, under­taken for one anoth­er and for the com­mon goal, brings res­ults mul­ti­plied many times over, and through the mir­acle of shared com­mit­ment a great­er res­ult emerges than any­thing one could ever achieve alone. And this res­ults in immeas­ur­able enthu­si­asm.

Pro­tect us both! Be pleased with us both! Let us labour togeth­er with zeal! Let our stud­ies enlight­en us! May love­less­ness never stand between us! Om, peace, peace, peace! (Katha Upan­ishad, Invoc­a­tion)

In the affairs of life there is always two fin­gers' breadth miss­ing, our rope always that much short­er than we need. If we lengthen it, it is still exactly two fin­gers short. And even if we gath­er up every rope in the neigh­bour­hood, it will still be two fin­gers short­er than it should be. But when we reach the limit of our per­son­al efforts and sur­render, we come one fin­ger closer to the solu­tion, and if we also receive the divine bless­ing, the other fin­ger's short­fall van­ishes too. Per­son­al self-sur­render and divine bless­ing are a tri­umphant pair.

Walk­ing the spir­itu­al path suc­cess­fully brings its tan­gible res­ults. In reli­gious lan­guage, the fruits of the Holy Spir­it are love, joy, peace, for­bear­ance, kind­ness, good­ness, fidel­ity, gen­tle­ness and tem­per­ance (Gal. 5.22), while the gifts are wis­dom, under­stand­ing, good coun­sel, know­ledge, spir­itu­al forti­tude, piety and fear of God. Put anoth­er way, we can say that the enlight­en­ment reached when spir­itu­al devel­op­ment has authen­tic­ally run its course brings a clear and com­posed reas­on and intel­lect; the capa­city for intu­it­ive per­cep­tion and pure tele­pathy; and an inspired life real­ised on the phys­ic­al plane of exist­ence. And it is this last that provides the authen­t­ic meas­ure, which makes grand words veri­fi­able, makes spir­itu­al striv­ing meas­ur­able, and, along­side the the­or­et­ic­al res­ults, gives prac­tic­al feed­back to ourselves and to the out­side world. The great ques­tion, then, is how far we man­age to become good people?