Example is contagious. Especially a bad example. And yet it is true that whatever example a great personality sets, people will follow. Some rightly and authentically, others only in semblance and imitation. The demonstration effect is that peculiar phenomenon whereby an example proves irresistible. In most cases this following or identification takes place subconsciously. If a youth takes an old man as his role model, it may easily happen that he adopts his tone of voice and his manner of speech, and even, for all his twenty years, starts walking with a stick. But such formal imitation does not by itself make anyone great. When a penniless man strives to imitate the life of the rich, to match, in something at least, the example he longs for, if only in a single spending habit – he is a victim of the very same effect.
Now, teaching is a strange thing – what you wish to pass on is taken in only with difficulty, while what were better forgotten lingers in people's memory. It was the same with you when, seeing your parents' example, you vowed that this was how you would not live, and then repeated the very mistakes you had wanted to avoid. The position of role models is a delicate matter in any case. It is said that even the whitest lily has a shadow. If you get too close to someone, you will also see the shadow side. So it is wise to keep a proper distance until you are able to separate the good from the bad, the inspired from the ordinary. Once you can separate folly and weakness from the authentic and pure example, you may step closer to your fellow men.
It is held that in the golden age the weaker man was able to rise to the purer, fuller role model. Today it seems the reverse prevails, and the role models sink to the lower level. If the adored idols turn out to be merely ordinary people, a cherished image may be shattered, but you come a step closer to the truth.
Every system is driven by the dynamic interplay of three principles: the dominance of upward alignment – that is, when the good example raises those who are weaker; the dominance of downward alignment – when even a man of refined thinking is able to put things simply, so that anyone can understand; and the healthy balance between the two.
The crystal, too, follows the demonstration effect – it reflects whatever setting it is placed in. On red velvet the translucent crystal is itself ruby red, and on yellow silk, sun-yellow. It has an existence of its own, and its distinctive trait is transparency, but it is precisely this that makes it reflect its surroundings.
Is man not a crystal too? As is his setting, so will he be.
A parable of the secret teachings likens the human skull to a drinking cup. Its mouth faces forward, the goblet itself is full of glory, and all around its rim sit ancient sages. Unravelling the poetic metaphor is instructive: the mouth of the goblet is the mouth of man, and its foot is the back plate of the skull. Its contents – the glory – refer to the glory of forms, which shows itself through the sense organs, while the seven sages on the goblet's rim are the perceiving senses (two eyes, two ears, two nostrils and the mouth), with speech, or the tongue, as the eighth. What matters for our inquiry is the goblet's contents, the glory, that is, all that the sense organs pass on to consciousness: experiences, perceptions, joys and dangers, attractions and enlightenments. Man's consciousness repeats the workings of the crystal in inverse form. The crystal reflects its outer surroundings, taking on their colours, just as the human intellect reflects the image of the outer world passed on by the sense organs. But while the crystal keeps its surroundings outside, man's consciousness engulfs them. It is said that the world is in consciousness, and not consciousness in the world. Yet what you take in, what example you follow, what you reflect back, depends on you as well. However strong the outer influence, guard your innermost, pure treasures. The starfish may live beneath the water, yet it is a star.