Christian theology uses a delicate term for the coming of Jesus into the world: incarnatio, that is, embodiment, according to which the divine logos took on human nature from Mary and appeared on earth as the God-man. If Jesus' being was not changed by his departure, then his arrival cannot have meant an essential change either – that is, he existed even before his earthly birth. Origen extended this idea to ordinary souls. The doctrine of preaexistentia, or previous life, goes back to Plato, who held that at the creation of the world God created souls as well, and at human birth unites them with bodily forms. According to Kant, the immortal soul that dwells in man must of necessity exist before its bodily existence too, for only that can be endless (that is, everlasting) which has no beginning either.
Such eternal existence of the soul – as against the transience of the body – is self-evident in the Eastern teachings. The antagonism between the eternal substance (the soul) and the transient form (the body) is resolved by the doctrine of the wandering of souls.
The soul's passage is called transanimation – here the emphasis is on the animus, the soul, whereas in transmigration what counts is the move, the change of body. The former concept focuses on the eternal subject, while the latter is action-oriented, centred on the event that takes place. The wandering of souls (let us keep to this term) states in general that at the death of the transient body the abiding soul moves out of it into a new bodily form. Its conditions and further details are explained differently by the various schools.
There are explanations – certain currents of Buddhism, for example, or popular esotericism – according to which the soul, having cast off its human body, can take on only a human form again, and after a few incarnations the road runs straight to complete purification. According to other explanations – such as the animist or totem cults, or what is perhaps the oldest, the ancient Indian theory of the wandering of souls – the soul's path may also lead from a human body into other, lower forms of existence. Human existence is regarded by practically every spiritual school as a privileged opportunity, in which the soul's awareness can manifest at a high level, and for this very reason man is answerable for his deeds. That is, the system by which deeds bear their consequences, the law of karma, determines the manner in which the body is changed.
According to ancient Indian philosophy the soul cannot be identified merely with the world of the emotions or with the worldly personality, but is a spiritual, transcendental spark of energy whose nature is being, consciousness and bliss. The subject of these qualities is the individual soul, for which the exceedingly precise Sanskrit language uses several terms. The term Brahman comes from the root √bri, which means: to grow, to spring forth, to stream, to overflow. Brahman can mean the World Soul, from which everything comes, but also the individual soul, which stands in eternal relation with its source, the World Soul, like the spark and the blaze. The word Brahman, as vitality, existence, aliveness, points to the soul's first trait: its being.
The term atman points to the essence, the marrow of a thing, and so in a metaphysical context it means, as against what is secondary, what is primary, what is essential. Applied to the human phenomenon, this is, in contrast to the transient body, the abiding spiritual substance. Substance, in turn, is that of which many things can be predicated, but substance itself cannot be predicated of anything. Atman, then, is man's innermost being, his very self, the bearer of awareness.
Finally, the term jiva means living being, and refers to the actual fullness of life, to being alive, as opposed to dead, inorganic matter. This vital (Brahman), conscious-in-essence (atman) living being (jiva) is the eternal entity which, after taking on a body, possesses that organism, and which, after leaving the body, takes on another bodily form.